Where does grasshopper come from rain
- Where does grasshopper come from rain
- Grasshopper Control
- Where does grasshopper come from rain
- Getting those grasshoppers
- Most areas won’t have grasshopper problems in 2014. But there are some places where farmers should hone their >
- Identifying pests
- Scouting and thresholds
- Control timing
- Cold Blooded – But Not Cold Hearted
- Staying In
- Out Past Curfew
- Just Waiting for the Party
- What triggers colour change? Effects of background colour and temperature on the development of an alpine grasshopper
- J. Pablo Valverde
- Holger Schielzeth
- Colour morph switches
- Temperature-cued colouration darkening
- Green-brown switches
- Colouration darkening
- Experimental setup
- Background colour treatment
- Temperature treatment
- Scoring of body colour
- Statistical analysis
- Availability of supporting data
Where does grasshopper come from rain
Grasshoppers are worse in hot dry years. When we have cool, wet springs, they can succumb to disease that keeps their numbers in check. Some years they don’t show up until the end of May and June. In 2006, they arrived in March, and even as late as August, young ones still appeared.
Control is difficult unless since it’s hard to hit them with a contact spray. The best thing to do, as soon as you see the nymphs, is to apply a bait. If you see leaves with tiny holes, or find more than 8 grasshoppers to a square yard, it’s time to treat.
Effective baits include Nolo Bait or Semaspore. Both contain a protozoa called Nosema locustae which is impregnated in bran flakes sweetened with sugar.
Apply by hand or with a rotary spreader, early in the morning, when grasshoppers are feeding. They don’t just drop dead – they’ll slow down and cling to plants. You won’t see any dead ones, since the healthy grasshoppers cannibalize the sick and weakened ones. Those grasshoppers will then ingest the protozoa; females will pass it along through their eggs. You’ll see a better reduction in population if you are diligent and enlist your neighbors in the project as well.
Be sure to use fresh bait that has kept chilled at the store, and bring it home in an ice chest. Grasshoppers will not be attracted to old bait. Look at the formulation date on the side of the container. If not chilled, it will last for 4 weeks. If refrigerated, a container will last 4 months.
You can also use a spray of Kaolin clay, available at craft stores that sell pottery supplies. Mix it up in a pump-up sprayer – 2 ½ cups of clay to a gallon water plus a teaspoon of soap as a surfactant. It’s important that you constantly agitate the sprayer while you work! Spray leaves lightly. It leaves a fine film of powder on the leaves, which gums up a grasshopper’s mouthparts, so it won’t eat there. The film also acts as sort of a shade cloth to protect leaves in summer’s heat! Obviously this won’t work if you use a sprinkler system, and must be reapplied after a rain.
Another prevention against grasshoppers is tightly staked row cover for plants that do not require pollination.
Where does grasshopper come from rain
Imperial College of Science and Technology, London
Imperial College of Science and Technology, London
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials.
If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in.
If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube.
You previously purchased this article on READCUBE_PURCHASE_DATE. Click on an option below to access.
View Enhanced PDF Access article on Wiley Online Library (HTML view) Download PDF for offline viewing
Logged in as READCUBE_USER. Log out of ReadCube.
1. The eggs of Acrididae are well adapted to survive adverse weather and mortalities in field populations from this cause are low in most years. The eggs of tropical species are generally only laid where conditions are suitable for growth, while an egg diapause is present in many temperate species, during which time eggs are resistant to extremes of both temperature and moisture. Only prolonged flooding or drought can cause high mortalities and then only at certain stages in the egg’s development. All eggs must absorb water to complete their development.
2. Nymphal and adult populations are far more dependent on the right weather conditions. Prolonged wet, cloudy weather greatly increases the mortality of both. Newly hatched nymphs are particularly susceptible. The way in which wet weather affects survival is little understood, but since the rate of feeding of Acrididae is so dependent on warm sunny conditions, it is possible that inclement weather may lead to starvation.
3. Fecundity is also greatly reduced by cool wet weather and the level indicated by laboratory studies is rarely reached in the field.
4. While both survival and fecundity are enhanced by hot, dry conditions, both are dependent on the presence of green food, which can be destroyed by excessive drought.
5. These opposing requirements of Acrididae make their numbers extremely sensitive to variations in weather and cause large fluctuations in their populations.
6. The eggs of most acridids are laid in bare ground, while vegetation is required by nymphs and adults for food and shelter. These requirements are again opposing. High‐density populations are often found in natural and man‐made ecotones, in which vegetation and bare ground occur in a mosaic pattern, thus providing both in their maximum availability. Ecotones are often unstable and the extent of the two vegetation components (bare ground and plant cover) is greatly influenced by weather. Variations in weather may then further affect acridid populations through effects on the carrying capacity of the habitat.
7. In locusts, gregarious behaviour and swarming are brought about by increases in population density, and variations in the relative extent of the components of the vegetation mosaic may cause crowding of one or other of the stages in the life cycle.
8. The influence of weather on acridid populations is so marked that correlations have been found for a large number of species between population size and particular weather conditions. The most important factor determining numbers varies between different species occupying different habitats and geographical regions.
9. Acridid populations are attacked by a large array of natural enemies–diseases, parasites and predators. Little quantitative work has been done on their effects, but biological considerations show that it is extremely unlikely that any are sufficiently density‐dependent to act in the way suggested by Nicholson (1933, 1954, 1958). It is likely that they do little more than damp the peaks in population fluctuations.
10. Many locusts and swarming grasshoppers emigrate from their habitats when their populations are large. This density‐dependent emigration possibly occurs in all Acrididae, though it is less well documented for non‐swarming species.
11. Locusts change both biologically and morphologically when crowded. These changes appear to be an adaptation to life away from their permanent habitat. Basically they reflect a change in the individua’s metabolism to favour greater mobility. These ‘phase’ changes also affect fecundity, and crowding results in a marked reduction in the number of eggs laid.
12. Population size may be controlled by emigration and phase changes. When numbers become high, emigration of part of the population brings them down again. In locusts, phase changes could theoretically reverse the trend at both the peaks and troughs in population size.
13. The dynamics of acridid populations are discussed in the light of the main theories in population control, and it is concluded that Milne’s theory (1957a) is closest to the known facts.
Getting those grasshoppers
Most areas won’t have grasshopper problems in 2014. But there are some places where farmers should hone their >
For the most part, Saskatchewan farmers are unlikely to be fighting waves of grasshoppers this year, according to Saskatchewan Agriculture’s 2014 hopper forecast.
But Saskatchewan’s 2014 forecast does show one bull’s eye of severe risk.
“And in the middle of that bull’s eye is Meadow Lake,” Peter Walsh told farmers at Cavalier Agrow’s farm forum in North Battleford this April. Walsh teaches courses in insect, weed and disease management, along with crop agronomy, at Lakeland College in Vermilion.
A count of at least 12 adult hoppers per square metre in the fall adds up to a severe risk forecast the following year.
Meadow Lake farmers aren’t the only Prairie producers likely to suffer hopper plagues this year. Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development’s forecast shows very severe risk (more than 24 hoppers found per square metre) near Grande Prairie, along with areas in the northeast and west-central regions.
Alberta also has severe risk areas elsewhere in the Peace, in the northeast, between Calgary and Lethbridge, and in the east-central part of the province.
Most surveyed areas in Manitoba last year rated very low risk. But hoppers numbered 18 per square metre at a site near Crystal City and 22 per square metre near Wawanesa.
Farmers in zones not rated as high risk aren’t necessarily going to get off scot-free this year, though.
Forecasts partly depend on weather and natural enemies, Dr. John Gavloski, entomologist with Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, said in an interview. And local populations can vary.
“We try to do our best to make sure that the counts are representative, but that’s not always the case,” said Gavloski.
Not all grasshoppers are crop killers and it’s well worth knowing which are friend and which are foe.
Manitobans walking the ditches might see bright green insects resembling grasshoppers. They are katydids, Gavloski said. “They’ll never move in and damage the crop.”
Both Gavloski and Walsh cited the Russian Thistle Grasshopper as a species that only eats weeds.
But farmers don’t have to be able to name the specific specie to know if a hopper will gorge itself on grain. Any grasshopper that makes a clacking noise while flying, has colourful wings (yellow or rose-coloured), or is flying in April or May is not a pest, Walsh told farmers.
“All of our pest species over-winter as eggs. That’s why in June they’re just hatching out,” said Gavloski. Pest species usually aren’t adults until July.
But some non-pest species over-winter, said Gavloski. “So they’re nearly mature early in the season.”
Females that are common pests will lay eggs in the fall “until the frost shuts her down,” said Walsh.
Nymphs emerge and begin feeding immediately, Walsh added. “The grasshopper does not have a resting stage. There is no stage in the hopper like a cocoon.”
Scouting and thresholds
Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development’s website recommends checking field edges, fence lines and ditches for grasshoppers. Egg beds generally line field edges so instars will be found there first.
To count grasshoppers, Manitoba Agriculture’s site suggests starting in one field corner, walking diagonally past the centre, and then walking straight out to one side of the field. While walking, note how many nymphs jump from a square foot area.
The ministry suggests taking at least 20 of these counts per survey. Dividing the total by two will give an approximate number of hoppers per square metre.
The economic threshold for grasshoppers is eight to 12 hoppers per square metre, according to Manitoba Ag’s site. Gavloski said this threshold is nominal, meaning there isn’t quantitative data correlating insect damage to yield loss.
“It’s basically a best guess of what people think is likely economical,” he said.
Farmers with lower-value crops should err on the high end of the economic threshold, Gavloski said. But for high-value crops, action is needed when grasshoppers breach the lower end of the spectrum, he added.
And crops such as lentils and flax likely require action before the grasshoppers hit the low end of the threshold. In fact, lentils at the flowering and podding stage have a recommended threshold of two hoppers per square metre.
Soybeans and canola aren’t preferred snacks for most hoppers, but there are species that will eat them once their preferred food sources dry down, Gavloski said.
“Cereal crops are favoured by some of our pest species, so they’re certainly more vulnerable,” said Gavloski.
Gavloski suggested controlling hoppers at roughly the third or fourth instar stage, before they start damaging crops.
“Adult grasshoppers are much harder to control than juveniles,” said Gavloski. “And the juveniles are often concentrated along field edges and borders.”
Walsh also recommended farmers delay spraying until nymphs hit the third instar. At that stage they’ll have small wing pads.
“What you’re waiting for is the complete hatch. If you jump the gun the first time you see those little nymphs out there, you may have to spray a second time,” said Walsh.
But farmers will need to weigh this advice against how much damage is already being done to the crop and the crop type, said Walsh. Grasses, such as wheat, will outgrow some of the early damage, Walsh added.
“And if I’m still waiting for the rest of the hatch, I probably don’t have peas or canola into bud or any kind of stage like that,” Walsh said.
It ultimately comes down to individual farmers’ risk tolerance, Walsh said. “Where’s your line? Everybody’s got their line. And just some cautions that if you can hold off a bit, you may only have to spray once.”
Common wisdom says that a wet spring is hard on newly-hatched hoppers, but spring rains don’t always drown grasshoppers.
Instars “breathe through their abdomens. And they can’t lift their abdomens out of the muck and the mud and the water,” Walsh explained.
But wet weather doesn’t affect the eggs, so whether or not spring rains kill instars comes down to timing.
“Heavy rains in June could potentially kill lots of grasshoppers. Heavy rains in April will do next to nothing,” said Gavloski.
And a cold spring will delay the hatch, and so if the wet weather passes, the eggs will still be viable, said Walsh.
Cold Blooded – But Not Cold Hearted
Insects are ectothermic and therefore their body temperature and activity is heavily influenced by their environment. So generally, the colder it is, the slower insects move and the warmer it is, the faster and more active insects are. However, if your life is completely dictated by the environment it makes it hard to exist for very long, especially if you’re a little insect. You don’t want to just be frozen in place every time an unexpected chill blusters by.
So insects have some tricks up their sleeves to help them deal with the inclement weather.
If bees get too cold, they’ll huddle together and shiver – just like us – to keep themselves warm. Queen bumblebees disengage their wings and use the flight muscles to generate heat to help them forage for food in the early, chilly spring.
And some arthropods simply have antifreeze proteins to help them when it gets extremely cold – like this snowflea that cheerily hops along snow banks in sub zero temperatures.
But if it’s raining, it’s probably not below freezing. So what do insects do in the rain?
That varies considerably based on the insect and their behavior.
Many insects can sense atmospheric pressure differences. Honey Bees for instance, just stay home if they sense a storm coming. Other bees, like Mason Bees may stay out and forage in light rain but will take shelter when it starts raining too heavily or the wind gets too intense.
Since the water can weigh them down, it’s harder for insects to fly when it’s cold and the rain can damage their wings, many insects just seek shelter. After a particular rainy afternoon in Ecuador, I looked under a small leafy plant and found several butterflies, hunkered down, just waiting for the storm to pass.
Some resting butterflies I found after a big storm in the Ecuadorian rain forest.
PC: Nancy Miorelli
Also, after a particularly wet morning, I found some Red Flat Bark Beetles (Cucujus clavipes) hiding away under some bark, clearly disgruntled that I disturbed their slumber.
Out Past Curfew
Raindrop size in relation to a mosquito.
PC: Dickerson et al. 2012
Small insects that thrive in warm and humid areas fly in the rain anyway. Mosquitoes, in particular, were studied to determine how they can resist the rain. For the most part, they’re just small and many raindrops don’t hit them. If they are hit by the raindrops, the mosquitoes just kind of become assimilated into it and fall with the raindrop. They then escape the falling raindrop with the help of their water resistant hairs. Every mosquito in this experiment managed to escape the water droplets.While we don’t really have the answers, it’s assumed that other small, flying, and agile insects do the same.
Being able to stay active when other insects are not reduces competition. There are lots of other insects that would like to blood feed on humans and other animals, so being able to stay out in conditions when others can’t, allows you to feast. You snooze you loose … literally.
Just Waiting for the Party
Some insects specifically wait for the rain to complete their reproductive cycles. The winged reproductives of a leafcutter ant in Texas fli]y just after rain on moonless nights in the early spring.
Rain beetles are another group that specifically wait for the rain. They live underground and during the rain, the females will come to the surface of their burrows and release pheremones. The males, also aware of the rain, escape their soil forts and fly to the find the females in the very early morning. By following the pheromone trail, the males find a female’s burrow and mate with her, where she then lays eggs, and they all live underground again until the next rainy winter.
Depends on the insect. Some wait for the storm to pass, some don’t go out at all, some just dodge the raindrops or escape them, and others specifically wait for the rain to get their funk on. Also, as a short aside, there are lots of insects just live in water, in which case, the rain doesn’t really affect them.
These Shield Bug nymphs don’t wanna go out there with the weather like that!
PC: Peter Nijenhuis (CC by NC ND 2.0)
What triggers colour change? Effects of background colour and temperature on the development of an alpine grasshopper
J. Pablo Valverde
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Morgenbreede 45, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Morgenbreede 45, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
Colour polymorphisms are a fascinating facet of many natural populations of plants and animals, and the selective processes that maintain such variation are as relevant as the processes which promote their development. Orthoptera, the insect group that encompasses grasshoppers and bush crickets, includes a particularly large number of species that are colour polymorphic with a marked green-brown polymorphism being particularly widespread. Colour polymorphism has been associated with the need for crypsis and background matching and background-dependent homochromy has been described in a few species. However, when and how different environmental conditions influence variation in colour remains poorly understood. Here we test for effects of background colour and ambient temperature on the occurrence of colour morph switches (green to brown or brown to green) and developmental darkening in the alpine dwelling club-legged grasshopper Gomphocerus sibiricus.
We monitored individually housed nymphae across three of their four developmental stages and into the first week after final ecdysis. Our data show an absence of colour morph switches in G. sibiricus, without a single switch observed in our sample. Furthermore, we test for an effect of temperature on colouration by manipulating radiant heat, a limiting factor in alpine habitats. Radiant heat had a significant effect on developmental darkening: individuals under low radiant heat tended to darken, while individuals under high radiant heat tended to lighten within nymphal stages. Young imagoes darkened under either condition.
Our results indicate a plastic response to a variable temperature and indicate that melanin, a multipurpose pigment responsible for dark colouration and presumed to be costly, seems to be strategically allocated according to the current environmental conditions. Unlike other orthopterans, the species is apparently unable to switch colour morphs (green/brown) during development, suggesting that colour morphs are determined genetically (or very early during development) and that other processes have to contribute to crypsis and homochromy in this species.
Colour polymorphism has fascinated biologists since the time of Darwin, and its evolutionary meaning is still being revealed [1–3]. Colour polymorphism, defined here as within-species phenotypic variation, occurs throughout the animal kingdom in several taxa of birds, fish, mammals, frogs, molluscs, spiders, several insect orders and also in plants [4–9]. The occurrence of colour polymorphisms in natural populations can result from biased mutation, pleiotropy and trade-offs, gene flow, spatially and/or temporally fluctuating selection and negative frequency-dependent selection that can counter loss of variation by genetic drift [10–13]. Furthermore, developmental plasticity and phenotypic flexibility, if they do not invoke significant cost, might allow the maintenance of polymorphisms. This can be particularly advantageous in unpredictably variable environments.
Insects offer a multitude of examples for the coexistence of two or more colour morphs in groups such as grasshoppers, mantoids, cicadids, damselflies, lepidopterans and beetles [13–15]. There is ample evidence for genetic and environmental effects, as well as genotype-by-environment interactions in colour determination [14–18]. Several species appear capable of modifying their colour in response to various environmental cues such as temperature, predation threats, behaviour stimulus (e.g., crab spiders which try to blend with their background to ambush prey, ), among others . Within Orthoptera, colour polymorphism is present in dozens of species (reviewed in , see also [19, 20]). Two particularly eye-catching forms of colour polymorphism in orthopterans are a widespread green-brown polymorphism in grasshoppers and bush crickets and the famous phase polymorphism in locusts [14, 21]. Phase polymorphism is triggered by changes in population density which induces changes in colour (typically black patterns in gregarious versus pale green or brown colours in solitary phases) as part of more complex changes in morphology, physiology, behaviour and life history [22–26].
The green-brown polymorphism is far more widespread among orthopterans than phase polymorphism and does not correlate with obvious changes in morphology and/or behaviour. Many families and genera of orthopterans comprise species that display either green or brown morphs, while other species are polymorphic (e.g., in genera Decticus, Metrioptera, Oedaleus). In some species, one of the morphs is very rare (such as brown morphs in Decticus verrucivorus), while in others the ratios are far more even (as in Metrioptera roeselii) . With respect to environmental effects, green morphs seem to develop primarily under high humidity, while brown morphs are favoured under dry environmental conditions [15, 27, 28]. Besides the two very striking forms of colour polymorphism mentioned before, there is a range of more fine-scaled within-species variation in colour pattern and colouration among orthopterans [29, 30]. Groundhoppers, for example, differ substantially in their colour patterns, which can be categorized into variable numbers of discrete morphs [31, 32]. In other species, differences in colour are more continuous such as with colouration of species in the genus Oedipoda. Such fine-scaled variation seems to be partly under genetic, partly under environmental control [15, 16, 33]. Many species also show occasional pinkish, purple, yellow or blue colour morphs , further illustrating the diversity of colour in orthopterans.
A very interesting phenomenon associated with colour polymorphism is homochromy, which describes matching of body colouration with variation in the background pattern of the local habitat [14, 15, 20, 35]. Such matching might arise for four different reasons: (i) local adaptation due to multi-generational history of selection on genetic polymorphisms, (ii) selective mortality within generations, (iii) individual-level choice of matching habitat patches , and (iv) developmental plasticity of body colouration to match local conditions . Developmental switches are particularly intriguing, because they allow individual-level matching, which is likely advantageous if habitats are unpredictably variable across generations, but predictable from environmental cues over the lifetime of individuals. Developmental matching has been reported in orthopterans for species with fine-scale variation in colour pattern [37, 38], but also for species which present the green and brown colour polymorphism (Table 1 ).
Studies on the effects of background colouration on the occurrence of colour morph switches in green-brown polymorphic (upper section) and other polymorphic (lower section) orthopterans
|Proportion of Switches|
|Species||Background Material||matched||non-matched||matched||non-matched||Stages with Switches||Reference|
|a) Green-Brown Polymorphism|
|Acrida turrita||fresh/dry grass||62||145||4 %||86 %||after ecdysis|||
|Acrida turrita||painted sawdust||14||15||0 %||100 %||after ecdysis|||
|Acrida turrita||painted sawdust||32||0 %||imago|||
|Oedaleus decorus||NA||10||66||0 %||88 %||after ecdysis|||
|Schistocerca americana||coloured paper||74||0 %||across stages|||
|Schistocerca gregaria||coloured paper||58||312||0 %||63.5 %||within stages|||
|Locusta migratoria||coloured paper||58||237||69 %||24 %||across stages|||
|Rhammatocerus||habitat background||3000 >||90 % >||imago|||
|Chorthippus biggutulus||coloured paper||257||30 %||across stages|||
|b) Other Polymorphisms|
|Oedipoda sp.||earth, clay, coal, stone, chalk||12||92||0 %||80 %||after ecdysis|||
|Tetrix subulata||sand||312||16 %||across stages|||
|Tetrix ceperoi||sand||228||16 %||across stages|||
The proportion of switches was calculated for various studies based on multiple assays either on matched or non-matched background colour. Studies do not indicate precise time of colour morph switch occurrence, only final results of repeated colour assessments across nymphal stages are stated (in the case of Ergene all switches occur after an ecdysis event). Percentages reflect amount of indiv >
Orthopterans are preyed upon by a large diversity of species, including birds, lizards, amphibians, spiders and other insects and are frequently parasitized by parasitic flies and mites [24, 34]. Visually hunting predators might constitute a force that can favour homochromy and crypsis, since survival to the imago stage is critical to individual fitness. Predators might also impose frequency-dependent selection if they develop search images and preferentially prey upon the most common morphs . However, there are other influences that might affect body colour and this may or may not be in conflict with crypsis. For example, body colour is likely to affect the absorption of radiant heat and therefore play an important role in thermoregulation [13, 39–41]. It has repeatedly been reported that orthopterans raised under cool conditions are darker than those raised under warm conditions [16, 19, 42–44].
The club-legged grasshopper Gomphocerus sibiricus is a highly sexually dimorphic alpine dwelling grasshopper that exhibits the green-brown polymorphism present in many other orthopterans. Green individuals are rarer than brown morphs in most populations. Despite substantial fluctuations in population density [24, 45], the species does not show any typical phase polymorphism . It inhabits alpine pastures and grassland with a very heterogeneous composition of open terrain strewn with stones and mottled by various types of short grasses and herbaceous plants. Climate conditions in the mountains are very unpredictable and variable within and between years. The maintenance of the green-brown colour polymorphism could be aided by the heterogeneous habitat and/or temporal variability in climate conditions in the native habitat of G. sibiricus.
In the present study we aimed to test the effect of two known factors on developmental colour changes in G. sibiricus. First, we assessed the effect of background colour (green or brown) on colour morph development across almost the entire ontogeny. We were particularly interested in whether individuals are able to switch colour morphs to achieve homochromy as it has been described in other species (Table 1 ). We predicted that if individuals were able to switch colour morphs, then individuals whose colour morph mismatched the background colour would be capable of matching their background at an advanced developmental stage. Second, we assessed the effect of temperature by means of a radiant heat treatment on developmental darkness, while controlling for humidity, population density and food moisture content. Here we predicted that if individuals were capable of manipulate the degree of melanin in their cuticle, thermoregulation needs would promote a colouration darkening under conditions of low radiation. We followed individuals from the second nymphal stage through to the imaginal stage during two independent rounds of trials with two different radiant heat regimes. Individuals were exposed to experimental treatments from the second nymphal stage onwards. The long exposure to experimental conditions allowed us to evaluate if colour changes occur exclusively in connection with moults or if changes were possible even within nymphal stages.
A total of 78 indiv >2 = 5.05, df = 1, p = 0.025).
Colour morph switches
No colour morph switch was observed among the 34 individuals in cages with matched background colours (6 green individuals in green cages and 28 brown in brown cages in total for both rounds). Forty-four individuals (33 brown and 11 green) were exposed to unmatched backgrounds, but no colour morph switches were observed among these 44 individuals. Reasoning based on binomial sampling (see methods section) suggests that if G. sibiricus is capable of switch colour, the rate of colour morph switches is well below values reported in previous studies (c ≤ 0.07, Table 2 ). When we concentrate on the subset of the data where colour morph switches were most likely, given both non-matched background and temperature treatment (brown individuals on a green background under high radiant heat treatment), the probability of colour morph switch is still well below expectations (c ≤ 0.17, Table 2 ).
Number of individuals of G. sibiricus on mismatched backgrounds, all of which did not switch colour morph during development
|Morph & Background||Temperature|
|Green on Brown||n = 3||n = 0||n = 3|
|c ≤ 0.63||NA||c ≤ 0.63|
|Brown on Green||n = 9||n = 9||n = 18|
|c ≤ 0.28||c ≤ 0.28||c ≤ 0.15|
|Sum||n = 12||n = 9||n = 21|
|c ≤ 0.22||c ≤ 0.28||c ≤ 0.13|
|Morph & Background||Temperature|
|Green on Brown||n = 4||n = 4||n = 8|
|c ≤ 0.53||c ≤ 0.53||c ≤ 0.31|
|Brown on Green||n = 7||n = 8||n = 15|
|c ≤ 0.35||c ≤ 0.31||c ≤ 0.18|
|Sum||n = 11||n = 12||n = 23|
|c ≤ 0.24||c ≤ 0.22||c ≤ 0.12|
|Round 1 + 2|
|Morph & Background||Temperature|
|Green on Brown||n = 7||n = 4||n = 11|
|c ≤ 0.35||c ≤ 0.53||c ≤ 0.24|
|Brown on Green||n = 16||n = 17||n = 33|
|c ≤ 0.17||c ≤ 0.16||c ≤ 0.09|
|Sum||n = 23||n = 21||n = 44|
|c ≤ 0.012||c ≤ 0.13||c ≤ 0.07|
Table depicts number of indiv >
Temperature-cued colouration darkening
We observed a significant change in colouration darkness in both rounds of trials. Individuals in the second and third nymphal stages (N2 and N3) of the round 1, and in the N2 and N4 stages of the round 2 experienced a change in darkness which depended on the direction of the temperature treatment. Individuals in the low radiant heat treatment became darker in colour, while those in the high radiant heat treatment became lighter in colour (Table 3 , Fig. 1 ). Individuals in the N3 stage in the R2 did not show a significant change in colour, yet the sign of the point estimate is the same as in stages N2 and N4. Individuals in the N4 stage of the R1 and under a high radiant heat treatment got significantly darker with age. Most of the low radiant heat treatment individuals from the R1 had perished, with the single remaining individual becoming lighter. Unlike the situation in nymphal stages, individuals in the imago stage undergo a darkening in colour in both treatments within the first week after final ecdysis (Fig. 1 ).
Results of the random-slope mixed effects model used to test for effects of radiant heat treatment and larval age on colouration darkness in both green and brown coloured morphs
|N2 (n = 42)||N2 (n = 35)|
|N1||First nymphal stage|
|N2||Second nymphal stage|
|N3||Third nymphal stage|
|N4||Fourth nymphal stage|
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
JPV and HS perceived and designed the experiment. JPV performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. JPV and HS analysed the data and the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.